In fact, if some sources are to be believed, Amazon is now directly selling a few hardcore pornographic titles, whether they realize it or not, but again, these items do not get customer complaints, likely because their covers are "less 'offensive'" than the Salon Kitty cover was perceived to be.Ĭult Epics's Monamour DVD cover is, in my opinion, even less "offensive" than the Salon Kitty one from Blue Underground, if only because the title is helpfully obscuring any "problem areas". There are a number of extremely explicit titles still readily available-many much more explicit than Salon Kitty-but because customers have not complained about these titles, they remain available. Well, amazon has it with "no image available." I wonder if that means they'll give Salon Kitty another chance?Īmazon removed Salon Kitty because the cover got complaints, and that's the only reason.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |